Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Delay as a Political Technique under Divided Government? Empirical Evidence from Germany, 1976-2005

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons41247

Manow,  Philip
Politik und politische Ökonomie, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons41146

Burkhart,  Simone
Politik und politische Ökonomie, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Manow, P., & Burkhart, S. (2008). Delay as a Political Technique under Divided Government? Empirical Evidence from Germany, 1976-2005. German Politics, 17(3), 353-366. doi:10.1080/09644000802300650.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-47B3-3
Zusammenfassung
This article analyses whether the majority situation of Germany’s second chamber has an impact on the duration of the legislative process. While it is often assumed that diverging majorities between Bundestag and Bundesrat delay law-making, the little empirical research that exists could not confirm such an effect of divided government. We therefore seek to discover whether and how an oppositional majority in the Bundesrat can credibly threaten to delay the legislative process for an undue length of time. Our study is based on a comprehensive dataset featuring a wealth of information on all bills adopted between 1976 and 2005. We show that divided government delays legislation, but to a somewhat lesser extent than often assumed. We show that under divided government the federal government loses some of its power over the parliamentary calendar – with possible consequences for its ability to implement its political agenda. Interestingly, this finding is not limited to bills that require the consent of the second chamber, but applies to all bills.