The Erosion Continues: Reply

Hassel, Anke

doi:10.1111/1467-8543.00234

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Zur Ablage hinzufügen

Lokale TagsFreigabegeschichteDetailsÜbersicht

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

The Erosion Continues: Reply

MPG-Autoren

/persons/resource/persons41194

Hassel, Anke
Regimewettbewerb und Integration in den industriellen Beziehungen, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8543.00234/abstract
(Zusammenfassung)

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8543.00234/pdf
(Verlagsversion)

Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)

Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.

Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

BJIR_40_2002_Hassel.pdf
(Verlagsversion), 261KB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)

Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar

Zitation

Hassel, A. (2002). The Erosion Continues: Reply. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40(2), 309-317. doi:10.1111/1467-8543.00234.

Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-5242-A

Zusammenfassung

How stable is the German system of industrial relations? The answer to this question depends on two factors. First, it depends on what we assume to be the important indicators for measuring institutional stability. And second, it depends on what we choose as the benchmark between stability and change. The main concern of Thomas Klikauer's critique of my `erosion thesis' seems to be the question of how to interpret the existing material. Is the glass half empty or half full? Are the changes in coverage of institutions signs for a fundamental long-term decline, or are these merely fluctuations that depend on the business cycle and are likely to pick up when unemployment vanishes? How can we accommodate contradicting accounts on the stability of German industrial relations institutions?