Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse




Conference Paper

Optimizing Monotone Functions Can Be Difficult


Doerr,  Benjamin
Algorithms and Complexity, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;


Winzen,  Carola
Algorithms and Complexity, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available

Doerr, B., Jansen, T., Sudholt, D., Winzen, C., & Zarges, C. (2010). Optimizing Monotone Functions Can Be Difficult. In R. Schaefer, C. Cotta, J. Kolodziej, & G. Rudolph (Eds.), Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, PPSN XI (pp. 42-51). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15844-5_5.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000F-16AC-C
Extending previous analyses on function classes like linear functions, we analyze how the simple (1+1) evolutionary algorithm optimizes pseudo-Boolean functions that are strictly monotone. Contrary to what one would expect, not all of these functions are easy to optimize. The choice of the constant $c$ in the mutation probability $p(n) = c/n$ can make a decisive difference. We show that if $c < 1$, then the \EA finds the optimum of every such function in $\Theta(n \log n)$ iterations. For $c=1$, we can still prove an upper bound of $O(n^{3/2})$. However, for $c > 33$, we present a strictly monotone function such that the \EA with overwhelming probability does not find the optimum within $2^{\Omega(n)}$ iterations. This is the first time that we observe that a constant factor change of the mutation probability changes the run-time by more than constant factors.