日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

会議論文

Context trees

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons44474

Ganzinger,  Harald
Programming Logics, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons45125

Nieuwenhuis,  Robert
Programming Logics, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons45130

Nivela,  Pilar
Programming Logics, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
There are no locators available
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
フルテキスト (公開)
公開されているフルテキストはありません
付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

Ganzinger, H., Nieuwenhuis, R., & Nivela, P. (2001). Context trees. In R., Goré, A., Leitsch, & T., Nipkow (Eds.), Automated reasoning: First International Joint Conference, IJCAR 2001 (pp. 242-256). Berlin, Germany: Springer.


引用: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000F-3209-0
要旨
Indexing data structures are well-known to be crucial for the efficiency of the current state-of-the-art theorem provers. Examples are \emph{discrimination trees}, which are like tries where terms are seen as strings and common prefixes are shared, and \emph{substitution trees}, where terms keep their tree structure and all common \emph{contexts} can be shared. Here we describe a new indexing data structure, \emph{context trees}, where, by means of a limited kind of context variables, also common subterms can be shared, even if they occur below different function symbols. Apart from introducing the concept, we also provide evidence for its practical value. We describe an implementation of context trees based on Curry terms and on an extension of substitution trees with equality constraints and where one does not distinguish between \emph{internal} and \emph{external} variables. Experiments with matching show that our preliminary implementation is already competitive with tightly coded current state-of-the-art implementations of the other main techniques. In particular space consumption of context trees is substantially less than for other index structures.