English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

On the structural relations of malachite. I. The rosasite and ludwigite structure families

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons21557

Girgsdies,  Frank
Inorganic Chemistry, Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons21347

Behrens,  Malte
Inorganic Chemistry, Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Girgsdies, F., & Behrens, M. (2012). On the structural relations of malachite. I. The rosasite and ludwigite structure families. Acta Crystallographica Section B-Structural Science, 68(2), 107-117. doi:10.1107/S0108768112005125.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000F-82A0-E
Abstract
The crystal structures of malachite Cu2(OH)2CO3 and rosasite (Cu,Zn)2(OH)2CO3, though not isotypic, are closely related. A previously proposed approach explaining this relation via a common hypothetical parent structure is elaborated upon on the basis of group–subgroup considerations, leading to the conclusion that the aristotype of malachite and rosasite should crystallize in the space group Pbam (No. 55). An ICSD database search for actual representatives of this aristotype leads to the interesting observation that the structure type of ludwigite (Mg,Fe)2FeO2BO3, which is adopted by several natural and synthetic oxide orthoborates M3O2BO3, is closely related to the proposed malachite–rosasite aristotype and thus to the malachite–rosasite family of hydroxide carbonates M2(OH)2CO3 in general. Relations within both structure families and their analogies are summarized in a joint simplified Bärnighausen tree.