English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Characteristic evolutions in numerical relativity using six angular patches

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons20669

Reisswig,  Christian
Astrophysical Relativity, AEI-Golm, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society;

Thornburg,  Jonathan
Astrophysical Relativity, AEI-Golm, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons4299

Szilagyi,  Bela
Astrophysical Relativity, AEI-Golm, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

cqg7_12_s21.pdf
(Publisher version), 250KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Reisswig, C., Bishop, N. T., Lai, C. W., Thornburg, J., & Szilagyi, B. (2007). Characteristic evolutions in numerical relativity using six angular patches. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 24, S327-S339.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-4961-9
Abstract
The characteristic approach to numerical relativity is a useful tool in evolving gravitational systems. In the past this has been implemented using two patches of stereographic angular coordinates. In other applications, a six-patch angular coordinate system has proved effective. Here we investigate the use of a six-patch system in characteristic numerical relativity, by comparing an existing two-patch implementation (using second-order finite differencing throughout) with a new six-patch implementation (using either second- or fourth-order finite differencing for the angular derivatives). We compare these different codes by monitoring the Einstein constraint equations, numerically evaluated independently from the evolution. We find that, compared to the (second-order) two-patch code at equivalent resolutions, the errors of the second-order six-patch code are smaller by a factor of about 2, and the errors of the fourth-order six-patch code are smaller by a factor of nearly 50.