English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Talk

Cross-linguistic diversity in spatial timelines: Evidence from sign language isolates

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons1159

De Vos,  Connie
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
INTERACT, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

De Vos, C., Nonaka, A., & Nyst, V. (2012). Cross-linguistic diversity in spatial timelines: Evidence from sign language isolates. Talk presented at the EuroBABEL Final Conference. Leiden. 2012-08-23 - 2012-08-26.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000F-D266-6
Abstract
This paper discusses the expression of time through spatial means in village sign languages of Indonesia, Ghana, Thailand, and Mexico. In the urban signing varieties reported thus far, the typical timeline runs along the signer’s sagittal axis, and is split at the signer's centre, such that the area behind the signer represents the past, and the front of the signer represents the future. This paper shows that the front-back timeline may be the typologically prevalent structure, but it is not the only option, and time can be projected onto space in a number of different ways. The main timeline in Chican Village Sign Language (Mexico) projects the past onto the signing space in front of the signer, and the future is conceptualised above the signer's head. Both Adamorobe Sign Language (Ghana) and Ban Khor Sign Language (Thailand) have adopted a vertically oriented timeline, but representing time from bottom to top and top to bottom respectively. Kata Kolok signers (Bali) do not make use of any of the body-anchored timelines, and have adopted a celestial timeline, running from East to West instead. These findings indicate that the impact of the visual modality is limited in the conceptualisation of temporal relations in sign languages, and that sign languages may utilise each of the dimensions of signing space to express temporal relations. These preliminary reports suggest that village sign languages – being language isolates –may continue to make unique contributions to our understanding of the typological variation among sign languages.