English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Coexisting overwintering strategies in Daphnia pulex: Clonal differences in sexual reproduction

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons56790

Lampert,  Winfried
Emeritus Group Lampert, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons56792

Larsson,  Petter
Department Ecophysiology, Max Planck Institute for Limnology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Max Planck Society;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

s4.pdf
(Publisher version), 595KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Lampert, W., Lampert, K. P., & Larsson, P. (2012). Coexisting overwintering strategies in Daphnia pulex: Clonal differences in sexual reproduction. Fundamental and Applied Limnology, 179(4), 281-291. doi:10.1127/1863-9135/2012/0202.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000F-D34A-D
Abstract
Using two sets of clones of Daphnia pulex derived from overwintering parthenogenetic females and neonates hatched from dormant embryos, we tested for a genetic basis of differing overwintering strategies. While in an earlier study we had tested if the two clonal groups differed with respect to their growth rates, which would give them different opportunities during the spring development, we now performed experiments on possible differences in traits related to sexual reproduction (i.e., male production and ephippia formation). Our working hypothesis was that clones isolated from the sediment egg bank show a greater tendency to reproduce sexually than females overwintering in the open water. Although individual clones showed large differences in the proportion of males among offspring under short-day conditions (zero to > 40 %), the clonal groups did not differ significantly. Ephippia production was also significantly different among clones, but due to the large variances the group means did not differ. Ephippia production and male production in individual clones were not correlated, hence the tendencies to produce males or ephippia varied independently. Although there were considerable differences in the mean reproductive characteristics between the groups, the low power of the tests prevented support of any of the hypotheses. Rather, it seems that there is incomplete temporal differentiation while some females may follow a mixed strategy implying the production of sexual eggs as insurance against catastrophic events and successive attempts to survive the winter as parthenogenetic adults, which would result in a reproductive advantage during early spring.