User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse




Journal Article

Beyond Affymetrix arrays: expanding the set of known hybridization isotherms and observing pre-wash signal intensities


Pozhitkov,  Alex E.
Department Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Max Planck Society;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

(Publisher version), 964KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available

Pozhitkov, A. E., Boube, I., Brouwer, M. H., & Noble, P. A. (2010). Beyond Affymetrix arrays: expanding the set of known hybridization isotherms and observing pre-wash signal intensities. Nucleic Acids Research, 38(5): e28. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp1122.

Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000F-D4B3-E
Microarray hybridization studies have attributed the nonlinearity of hybridization isotherms to probe saturation and post-hybridization washing. Both processes are thought to distort ‘true’ target abundance because immobilized probes are saturated with excess target and stringent washing removes loosely bound targets. Yet the paucity of studies aimed at understanding hybridization and dissociation makes it difficult to align physicochemical theory to microarray results. To fill the void, we first examined hybridization isotherms generated on different microarray platforms using a ribosomal RNA target and then investigated hybridization signals at equilibrium and after stringent wash. Hybridization signal at equilibrium was achieved by treating the microarray with isopropanol, which prevents nucleic acids from dissolving into solution. Our results suggest that (i) the shape of hybridization isotherms varied by microarray platform with some being hyperbolic or linear, and others following a power-law; (ii) at equilibrium, fluorescent signal of different probes hybridized to the same target were not similar even with excess of target and (iii) the amount of target removed by stringent washing depended upon the hybridization time, the probe sequence and the presence/absence of nonspecific targets. Possible physicochemical interpretations of the results and future studies are discussed.