Testing the Agreement/Tense Omission Model: Why the data on children's use of 
non-nominative 3psg subjects count against the ATOM

Pine, Julian M.; Rowland, Caroline F.; Lieven, Elena; Theakston, Anna L.

doi:10.1017/S0305000905006860

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Testing the Agreement/Tense Omission Model: Why the data on children's use of non-nominative 3psg subjects count against the ATOM

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons72905

Pine, Julian M.
Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons72821

Lieven, Elena
Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., Lieven, E., & Theakston, A. L. (2005). Testing the Agreement/Tense Omission Model: Why the data on children's use of non-nominative 3psg subjects count against the ATOM. Journal of Child Language, 32(2), 269-289. doi:10.1017/S0305000905006860.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0010-0368-5

Abstract

There is no abstract available