English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Mutual adaptive timing in interpersonal action coordination

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons19898

Nowicki,  Lena
Max Planck Research Group Music Cognition and Action, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons19932

Prinz,  Wolfgang
Department Psychology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons19767

Keller,  Peter E.
Max Planck Research Group Music Cognition and Action, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;
Music Cognition and Action Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany;
The MARCS Institute, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Nowicki, L., Prinz, W., Grosjean, M., Repp, B. H., & Keller, P. E. (2013). Mutual adaptive timing in interpersonal action coordination. Psychomusicology, 23(1), 6-20. doi:10.1037/a0032039.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0010-23E2-2
Abstract
Coperformers in musical ensembles continuously adapt the timing of their actions to maintain interpersonal coordination. The current study used a dyadic finger-tapping task to investigate whether such mutual adaptive timing is predominated by assimilation (i.e., copying relative timing, akin to mimicry) or compensation (local error correction). Our task was intended to approximate the demands that arise when coperformers coordinate complementary parts with a rhythm section in an ensemble. In two experiments, paired musicians (the coperformers) were required to tap in alternation, in synchrony with an auditory pacing signal (the rhythm section). Serial dependencies between successive asynchronies produced by alternating individuals' taps relative to the pacing tones revealed greater evidence for temporal assimilation than compensation. By manipulating the availability of visual and auditory feedback across experiments, it was shown that this assimilation was strongest when coactors' taps triggered sounds, while the effects of visual information were negligible. These results suggest that interpersonal temporal assimilation was mediated by perception–action coupling in the auditory modality. Mutual temporal assimilation may facilitate coordination in musical ensembles by automatically increasing stylistic compatibility between coperformers, thereby assisting them to sound cohesive.