Some structural aspects of language are more stable than others: A comparison 
of seven methods

Dediu, Dan; Cysouw, M. A.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055009

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Some structural aspects of language are more stable than others: A comparison of seven methods

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons34

Dediu, Dan
Language and Genetics Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, External Organizations;

External Resource

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0055009#s5
(Supplementary material)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

Dediu_PLoS_ONE__2013.pdf
(Publisher version), 1024KB

Supplementary Material (public)

Dediu_Supp_Info_Methods_S1.pdf
(Supplementary material), 155KB

Citation

Dediu, D., & Cysouw, M. A. (2013). Some structural aspects of language are more stable than others: A comparison of seven methods. PLoS One, 8: e55009. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055009.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0010-8D4C-A

Abstract

Understanding the patterns and causes of differential structural stability is an area of major interest for the study of language change and evolution. It is still debated whether structural features have intrinsic stabilities across language families and geographic areas, or if the processes governing their rate of change are completely dependent upon the specific context of a given language or language family. We conducted an extensive literature review and selected seven different approaches to conceptualising and estimating the stability of structural linguistic features, aiming at comparing them using the same dataset, the World Atlas of Language Structures. We found that, despite profound conceptual and empirical differences between these methods, they tend to agree in classifying some structural linguistic features as being more stable than others. This suggests that there are intrinsic properties of such structural features influencing their stability across methods, language families and geographic areas. This finding is a major step towards understanding the nature of structural linguistic features and their interaction with idiosyncratic, lineage- and area-specific factors during language change and evolution.