Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Forschungspapier

Preference for Randomization: Empirical and Experimental Evidence

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons51179

Dwenger,  Nadja
Public Economics, MPI for Tax Law and Public Finance, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2192422
(beliebiger Volltext)

Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Dwenger, N., Kübler, D., & Weizsäcker, G. (2012). Preference for Randomization: Empirical and Experimental Evidence. Working Paper of the Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance, No. 2012-14.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000E-7FCA-5
Zusammenfassung
We investigate violations of consequentialism in the form of the stochastic dominance property. The property is shared by many theories of choice and implies that the decision-maker prefers receiving the best outcome for sure over all lotteries that involve multiple outcomes. We run experiments to demonstrate that dominated randomization can be attractive. In treatments where decision-makers are asked to submit multiple decisions without knowing which one is relevant, many participants submit contradictory sets of decisions and thereby induce a dominated lottery between outcomes. Explicit choice of non-consequentialist randomization is observed in a separate treatment. A possible reason for the effect is the desire to avoid having to make the decision. A large data set on (high-stake) university applications in Germany shows patterns that are consistent with a preference for randomization.