Validation of stratospheric water vapour measurements from the airborne 
microwave radiometer AMSOS

Mueller, S. C.; Kämpfer, N.; Feist, D. G.; Haefele, A.; Milz, M.; Sitnikov, N.; Schiller, C.; Kiemle, C.; Urban, J.

doi:10.5194/acp-8-3169-2008

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Validation of stratospheric water vapour measurements from the airborne microwave radiometer AMSOS

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons62373

Feist, D. G.
Atmospheric Remote Sensing Group, Dr. D. Feist, Department Biogeochemical Systems, Prof. M. Heimann, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3169-2008
(Publisher version)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

BGC1088.pdf
(Publisher version), 3MB

BGC1088D.pdf
(Preprint), 7MB

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Mueller, S. C., Kämpfer, N., Feist, D. G., Haefele, A., Milz, M., Sitnikov, N., et al. (2008). Validation of stratospheric water vapour measurements from the airborne microwave radiometer AMSOS. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 8(12), 3169-3183. doi:10.5194/acp-8-3169-2008.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000E-D720-9

Abstract

We present the validation of a water vapour dataset obtained by the Airborne Microwave Stratospheric Observing System AMSOS, a passive microwave radiometer operating at 183 GHz. Vertical profiles are retrieved from spectra by an optimal estimation method. The useful vertical range lies in the upper troposphere up to the mesosphere with an altitude resolution of 8 to 16 km and a horizontal resolution of about 57 km. Flight campaigns were performed once a year from 1998 to 2006 measuring the latitudinal distribution of water vapour from the tropics to the polar regions. The obtained profiles show clearly the main features of stratospheric water vapour in all latitudinal regions. Data are validated against a set of instruments comprising satellite, ground-based, airborne remote sensing and in-situ instruments. It appears that AMSOS profiles have a dry bias of 0 to -20%, when compared to satellite experiments. Also a comparison between AMSOS and in-situ hygrosondes FISH and FLASH have been performed. A matching in the short overlap region in the upper troposphere of the lidar measurements from the DIAL instrument and the AMSOS dataset allowed water vapour profiling from the middle troposphere up to the mesosphere.