English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

The stable isotope signature of methane emitted from plant material under UV irradiation

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons62345

Brand,  Willi A.
Service Facility Stable Isotope, Dr. W. A. Brand, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons62380

Geilmann,  Heike
Service Facility Stable Isotope, Dr. W. A. Brand, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Vigano, I., Röckmann, T., Holzinger, R., Van Dijk, A., Keppler, F., Greule, M., et al. (2009). The stable isotope signature of methane emitted from plant material under UV irradiation. Atmospheric Environment, 43(35), 5637-5646. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.046.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000E-D922-A
Abstract
Recent experiments have shown that dry and fresh leaves, other plant matter, as well as several structural plant components, emit methane upon irradiation with UV light. Here we present the source isotope signatures of the methane emitted from a range of dry natural plant leaves and structural compounds. UV-induced methane from organic matter is strongly depleted in both 13C and D compared to the bulk biomass. The isotopic content of plant methoxyl groups, which have been identified as important precursors of aerobic methane formation in plants, falls roughly halfway between the bulk and CH4 isotopic composition. C3 and C4/CAM plants show the well-established isotope difference in bulk 13C content. Our results show that they also emit CH4 with different [delta]13C value. Furthermore, [delta]13C of methoxyl groups in the plant material, and ester methoxyl groups only, show a similar difference between C3 and C4/CAM plants. The correlation between the [delta]13C of emitted CH4 and methoxyl groups implies that methoxyl groups are not the only source substrate of CH4. Interestingly, [delta]D values of the emitted CH4 are also found to be different for C3 and C4 plants, although there is no significant difference in the bulk material. Bulk [delta]D analyses may be compromised by a large reservoir of exchangeable hydrogen, but no significant [delta]D difference is found either for the methoxyl groups, which do not contain exchangeable hydrogen. The [delta]D difference in CH4 between C3 and C4 plants indicates that at least two different reservoirs are involved in CH4 emission. One of them is the OCH3 group, the other one must be significantly depleted, and contribute more to the emissions of C3 plants compared to C4 plants. In qualitative agreement with this hypothesis, CH4 emission rates are higher for C3 plants than for C4 plants.