English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Optimizing the separation of gaseous enantiomers by simulated moving bed and pressure swing adsorption

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons86477

Seidel-Morgenstern,  A.
Physical and Chemical Foundations of Process Engineering, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, Max Planck Society;
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, External Organizations;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Bentley, J., Huang, Q., Kawajiri, Y., Eic, M., & Seidel-Morgenstern, A. (2011). Optimizing the separation of gaseous enantiomers by simulated moving bed and pressure swing adsorption. Adsorption, 17(1), 159-170. doi:10.1007/s10450-010-9299-x.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-8CDD-8
Abstract
The resolution of racemic gas mixtures by simulated moving bed (SMB) and pressure swing adsorption (PSA) is investigated by dynamic simulation and optimization. Enantiomer separation of inhalation anesthetics is important because there is evidence that the purified enantiomers may have different pharmacological properties than the racemate. The model parameters reported in an experimental investigation performed elsewhere are used to study the feasibility of this separation using SMB and PSA configurations. Both processes were modeled in gPROMS® as systems of differential algebraic equations. Operating conditions are optimized such that the feed throughput and product recovery for each process were maximized subject to equal constraints on the pressures and superficial gas velocities. SMB was found to be capable of resolving racemic feed mixtures with purity and recovery exceeding 99%. On the other hand, PSA was also able to provide a single purified enantiomer with low recovery of about 30% which may limit its application to enantiomer separation. Nevertheless, PSA consumes less desorbent, and achieves higher throughput at the sacrifice of lower recovery. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 [accessed February 8th 2011]