Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
Zur Ablage hinzufügen
  Lokale TagsFreigabegeschichteDetailsÜbersicht

Freigegeben
Zeitschriftenartikel

Solid−Liquid Phase Equilibria of N-Methylephedrine Enantiomers in Two Chiral Solvents

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons86390

Lorenz,  H.
Physical and Chemical Foundations of Process Engineering, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons86477

Seidel-Morgenstern,  A.
Physical and Chemical Foundations of Process Engineering, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, Max Planck Society;
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, External Organizations;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Kaemmerer, H., Tulashie, S. K., Lorenz, H., & Seidel-Morgenstern, A. (2010). Solid−Liquid Phase Equilibria of N-Methylephedrine Enantiomers in Two Chiral Solvents. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, 55(3), 1131-1136. doi:10.1021/je900572c.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-9048-4
Zusammenfassung
The ternary solubility phase diagrams of the N-methylephedrine species in two chiral solvents, (S)-ethyl lactate and (2R,3R)-diethyl tartrate, have been studied. Solubility measurements were performed for enantiomeric compositions and temperatures ranging from 1:1 mixtures to the pure enantiomer and from (273 to 313) K. Predicted ideal solubility curves of the N-methylephedrine species in both solvents revealed deviations from experimental data. The nonrandom two-liquid model was applied to quantify and parametrize these nonidealities and nonideal heterochiral interactions among the enantiomers by means of corresponding activity coefficients. The solvent−solute interactions were interpreted as nonchiral specific, since no asymmetry in the chiral systems were found. The selection of an appropriate solvent for a crystallization-based enantioseparation based on the shape of solubility isotherms is discussed. Copyright © 2009 American Chemical Society. [accessed November 26, 2009]