Response to commentaries on our paper: Critical comments on dynamic causal 
modelling

Lohmann, Gabriele; Mueller, Karsten; Turner, Robert

doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.041

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Response to commentaries on our paper: Critical comments on dynamic causal modelling

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons19821

Lohmann, Gabriele
Department Neurophysics, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons19872

Mueller, Karsten
Methods and Development Unit Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons20055

Turner, Robert
Department Neurophysics, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Lohmann, G., Mueller, K., & Turner, R. (2013). Response to commentaries on our paper: Critical comments on dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage, 75, 279-281. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.041.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-A6C0-5

Abstract

First of all, we would like to state that we are pleased that our paper has spawned a vivid debate about the validity of DCM. Given that DCM has been around for so many years, we think that this was long overdue. In the following, we would like to respond to the comments by Friston et al. and Breakspear.