Experiments of Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding for Remotely Piloted Vehicles 
with a Mixed Wind Gust Rejection/Obstacle Avoidance Task

Alaimo, S; Pollini L, Bresciani, JP; Bülthoff, HH

doi:10.2514/6.2011-6242

アイテム詳細

登録内容を編集ファイル形式で保存

一時保存へ追加

このアイテムの新しいバージョンが利用可能です:
https://pure.mpg.de/pubman/item/item_1788100_3

詳細要約

公開

会議論文

Experiments of Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding for Remotely Piloted Vehicles with a Mixed Wind Gust Rejection/Obstacle Avoidance Task

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons83778

Alaimo, S
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons83831

Pollini L, Bresciani, JP
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons83839

Bülthoff, HH
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

There are no locators available

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

フルテキスト (公開)

公開されているフルテキストはありません

付随資料 (公開)

There is no public supplementary material available

引用

Alaimo, S., Pollini L, Bresciani, J., & Bülthoff, H. (2011). Experiments of Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding for Remotely Piloted Vehicles with a Mixed Wind Gust Rejection/Obstacle Avoidance Task. In AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference (pp. 732-749). Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran.

引用: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-BAD8-E

要旨

This paper focuses on a novel concept of haptic cueing developed in order to optimize the performance of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) teleoperator and to improve the human-machine interfaces in a mixed obstacle avoidance/wind gust rejection task. It presents an experimental evaluation of two different Haptic aiding concepts: one based on what we called Direct Haptic Aiding (DHA) approach, and a novel one based on the Indirect Haptic Aiding (IHA) approach. The two haptic aids were compared with a baseline condition in which no haptic force was associated to the obstacles (NoEF condition). It will be shown that IHA-based approach definitely improves the pilots¡¯ performance with respect to the other approaches. A significant difference in performance (i.e. the number of collisions) was noticed between IHA and both DHA and NoEF conditions. The goal of this paper is to show that the IHA philosophy is a valid alternative to the other commonly used, and published in the scientific literature, approaches which fall in the DHA category.