English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Meeting Abstract

Visual, proprioceptive, and inertial cue‐weighting in travelled distance perception

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons84378

Campos,  J
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons83842

Butler,  J
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons84088

Mohler,  B
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons83839

Bülthoff,  HH
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Campos, J., Butler, J., Mohler, B., & Bülthoff, H. (2008). Visual, proprioceptive, and inertial cue‐weighting in travelled distance perception. International Journal of Psychology, 43(3-4), 256.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-C8B5-D
Abstract
When moving through space, visual, proprioceptive, and inertial information contribute to the perception of distance travelled, yet little is known about how each are weighted when simultaneously available. In this study participants moved through a large, fully tracked space by either walking or being passively driven by a robotic wheelchair (proprioception removed) and were asked to judge the distance travelled. Visually travelled distances (presented via a head‐mounted display) were either congruent or incongruent with the proprioceptive/inertial inputs. Responses reflect a higher weighting of body‐based cues during walking and a relatively equal weighting of inertial and visual cues during passive movement.