English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Cognitive Factors can Influence Self-Motion Perception (Vection) in Virtual Reality

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons84170

Riecke,  BE
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons84199

Schulte-Pelkum,  J
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons83788

Avraamides,  MN
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons84287

von der Heyde,  M
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons83839

Bülthoff,  HH
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Locator
There are no locators available
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts available
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Riecke, B., Schulte-Pelkum, J., Avraamides, M., von der Heyde, M., & Bülthoff, H. (2006). Cognitive Factors can Influence Self-Motion Perception (Vection) in Virtual Reality. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 3(3), 194-216. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1166087.1166091.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-D0CF-7
Abstract
Research on self-motion perception and simulation has traditionally focussed on the contribution of physical stimulus properties (bottom-up factors) using abstract stimuli. Here, we demonstrate that cognitive (top-down) mechanisms like ecological relevance and presence evoked by a virtual environment can also enhance visually induced self-motion illusions (vection). In two experiments, naive observers were asked to rate presence and the onset, intensity, and convincingness of circular vection induced by different rotating visual stimuli presented on a curved projection screen (FOV: 54°×45°). Globally consistent stimuli depicting a natural 3D scene proved more effective in inducing vection and presence than inconsistent (scrambled) or unnatural (upside-down) stimuli with similar physical stimulus properties. Correlation analyses suggest a direct relationship between spatial presence and vection. We propose that the spatial reference frame evoked by the naturalistic environment increased the believability of the visual stimulus, such that it was more easily accepted as a stable scene with respect to which visual motion is more likely to be judged as self-motion than object-motion. This work extends our understanding of mechanisms underlying self-motion perception, and might thus help to improve the effectiveness and believability of Virtual Reality applications.