Explicit Mechanisms Do Not Account for Implicit Localization and Identification 
of Change

Thornton, IM; Fernandez-Duque , D

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Poster

Explicit Mechanisms Do Not Account for Implicit Localization and Identification of Change

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons84258

Thornton, IM
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.psychonomic.org/resource/resmgr/Annual_Meeting/Past_and_Future_Meetings/Abstracts02.pdf
(Abstract)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Thornton, I., & Fernandez-Duque, D. (2002). Explicit Mechanisms Do Not Account for Implicit Localization and Identification of Change. Poster presented at 43rd Annual Meeting of The Psychonomic Society, Kansas City, MO, USA.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-DE85-E

Abstract

Toronto-Localization and priming studies have revealed that changes that do not reach awareness can nevertheless influence behavior.
Mitroff, Franconeri, and Simons (in press) have recently challenged this claim, arguing instead that explicit observer strategies may account for previous findings. Here, we present new evidence showing that this is not the case. We also discuss new behavioral, neuroimaging, and eye movement studies that further support the notion of implicit change detection.