Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Persistence of orientation toward a temporarily invisible landmark in Drosophila melanogaster

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons84975

Strauss,  R
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Former Department Neurophysiology of Insect Behavior, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons246227

Pichler,  J
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Former Department Neurophysiology of Insect Behavior, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Strauss, R., & Pichler, J. (1998). Persistence of orientation toward a temporarily invisible landmark in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 182(4), 411-423. doi:10.1007/s003590050190.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-E92D-A
Zusammenfassung
In arena experiments with the walking fruit fly, we found a remarkable persistence of orientation toward a landmark that disappeared during the
fly's approach. The directional stability achieved by 'after-fixation' allows a fly to continue pursuit under natural conditions, where a selected target is
frequently concealed by surrounding structures. The persistence of after-fixation was investigated in Buridan's paradigm, where a fly walks persistently
back and forth between two inaccessible landmarks. Upon disappearance of a selected target, the flies maintained their intended course for more than 15
body lengths of approximately 2.5 mm in about 50 of the trials. About 13 even exceeded 75 body lengths. About 88 of the approaches clustered in equal
portions around peaks at 2.4 s and 8.6 s. About 12 of the approaches persisted even longer. In contrast, a single peak at about 2.2 s is sufficient to describe
the persistence of orientation in a random walk. The ability to pursue an invisible landmark is disturbed neither by a transient angular deviation from the
course toward this landmark, when this target disappeared, nor by a distracting second landmark. Accordingly, after-fixation seems to require an internal
representation of the direction toward the concealed target, and idiothetical course control to maintain this direction.