English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Visual fixation and tracking by flies: Mathematical properties of simple control systems

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons84913

Poggio,  T
Former Department Information Processing in Insects, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons84160

Reichardt,  W
Former Department Information Processing in Insects, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Poggio, T., & Reichardt, W. (1981). Visual fixation and tracking by flies: Mathematical properties of simple control systems. Biological Cybernetics, 40(2), 101-112. doi:10.1007/BF00344289.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-F0C9-6
Abstract
The study of the orientation behavior of flies requires the consideration of a few simple control systems for fixation and tracking. In this paper two such control systems are analyzed, in terms of the corresponding difference and differential equations. The first control system corrects with a delay ɛ the angular trajectory proportionally to the error angle ψ; the second control system also corrects proportionally to the error angle ψ but only when the absolute value of ψ is increasing. The differential equations are
ψ∘(t)=−α′ψ(t−ε)+A′
((0))

and
ψo(t)=−α′ψ(t−ε)⋅u[ψ(t−ε)ψo(t−ε)]+A′
((*))

u[ ] being the step function (u[x]=1 if x>0, otherwise u[x]=0). Under suitable restrictions on the parameters it is proved (a) that the difference equations
xn+1=xn−αxn+A
((0'))

and
xn+2=xn+1−αxn+1⋅u[xn+1⋅(xn+1−xn)]+A,
((*'))

which can be associated to Eqs. (0) and (*), are “asymptotically equivalent” (for large n) if the time scale is “smoothed” over two time units and (b) that the second equation, with 0<α<2, always converge to a set of oscillating solutions of period 2 for arbitrary initial conditions. Numerical simulations show that the delay-differential equations behave in a similar way. We have also demonstrated with computer simulations that both control systems can satisfactorily predict the 3-D trajectory of a fly chasing another fly. The main biological implications of the analysis are: (1) The two control systems are practically equivalent descriptions of the fly's control of flight on a “coarse” time scale (2 times the fly's delay), consistently with an earlier more general derivation of Eq. (0) (Poggio and Reichardt, 1973). (2) On a fine time scale the second control system is characterized by an asymptotic oscillation with period twice the fly's delay. It is conjectured that a wide range of control systems of the same general type must have a similar oscillatory behavior. Finally, we predict the existence of asymptotic oscillations in the angular trajectory and the torque of tracking flies (if a control system of the second type is involved to a significant extent). Such oscillations should have a basic period of twice the effective reaction delay, and should be best detectable outside the binocular region. Closed loop experiments and the analysis of free flight trajectories may provide critical tests of this prediction.