Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Three different profiles: Early socio-communicative capacities in typical Rett syndrome, the preserved speech variant and normal development

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons19679

Grossmann,  Tobias
Max Planck Research Group Early Social Development, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Marschik, P. B., Bartl-Pokorny, K. D., Tager-Flusberg, H., Kaufmann, W. E., Pokorny, F., Grossmann, T., et al. (2014). Three different profiles: Early socio-communicative capacities in typical Rett syndrome, the preserved speech variant and normal development. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 17(1), 34-38. doi:10.3109/17518423.2013.837537.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0014-4AA2-D
Zusammenfassung
Background and aims: This is the first study aiming to compare pre-diagnostic socio-communicative development of a female with typical Rett syndrome (RTT), a female with the preserved speech variant of RTT (PSV) and a control toddler.

Methods: We analysed 1275 min of family videos at the participants’ age between 9 and 24 months and used the Inventory of Potential Communicative Acts (IPCA) to delineate their repertoires of communicative forms and functions.

Results: The results revealed different profiles for the three different conditions. The repertoire of communicative gestures and (pre)linguistic vocalizations was most comprehensive in the control toddler, followed by the female with PSV and the female with RTT.

Conclusion: These findings contribute to the growing knowledge about early developmental abnormalities in RTT. In order to define distinctive profiles for typical and atypical RTT and evaluate their specificity, a larger body of evidence is needed.