English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Disentangling the climate-conflict nexus: Empirical and theoretical assessment of vulnerabilities and pathways

MPS-Authors
There are no MPG-Authors available
External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Scheffran, J., Brzoska, M., Kominek, J., Link, M., & Schilling, J. (2012). Disentangling the climate-conflict nexus: Empirical and theoretical assessment of vulnerabilities and pathways. Review of European Studies, 4, 1-13. doi:10.5539/res.v4n5p1.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0019-D13F-F
Abstract
Recent research has provided new insights into the relationship between climate change and violent conflict. In this review we compare the results, methodologies, and data applied in the peer-reviewed literature to recap the current state of the debate. While long-term historical studies suggest a coincidence between climate variability and armed conflict, empirical findings are less conclusive for recent periods. Disentangling the climate-conflict nexus, we discuss causal pathways such as precipitation changes, freshwater scarcity, food insecurity, weather extremes, and environmental migration. A geographic differentiation indicates that countries with low human development are particularly vulnerable to the double exposure of natural disasters and armed conflict. Thus, effective institutional frameworks and governance mechanisms are important to prevent climate-induced conflicts and to strengthen cooperation. Applying an integrative framework connecting climate change, natural resources, human security, and societal stability, we pinpoint future research needs.