English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Conference Paper

Functional trade-off between lexical tone and intonation: Typological evidence from polar-question marking

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons1472

Torreira,  Francisco
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
INTERACT, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons79032

Roberts,  Sean G.
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons72724

Hammarström,  Harald
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

Locator
There are no locators available
Fulltext (public)

Torreira_Roberts_Hammarstrom_2014.pdf
(Publisher version), 925KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Torreira, F., Roberts, S. G., & Hammarström, H. (2014). Functional trade-off between lexical tone and intonation: Typological evidence from polar-question marking. In C. Gussenhoven, Y. Chen, & D. Dediu (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Language (pp. 100-103).


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0018-1937-1
Abstract
Tone languages are often reported to make use of utterancelevel intonation as well as of lexical tone. We test the alternative hypotheses that a) the coexistence of lexical tone and utterance-level intonation in tone languages results in a diminished functional load for intonation, and b) that lexical tone and intonation can coexist in tone languages without undermining each other’s functional load in a substantial way. In order to do this, we collected data from two large typological databases, and performed mixed-effects and phylogenetic regression analyses controlling for genealogical and areal factors to estimate the probability of a language exhibiting grammatical devices for encoding polar questions given its status as a tonal or an intonation-only language. Our analyses indicate that, while both tone and intonational languages tend to develop grammatical devices for marking polar questions above chance level, tone languages do this at a significantly higher frequency, with estimated probabilities ranging between 0.88 and .98. This statistical bias provides cross-linguistic empirical support to the view that the use of tonal features to mark lexical contrasts leads to a diminished functional load for utterance-level intonation.