日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

書籍の一部

The structure of F−actin calculated from X−ray fibre diagrams and the 0.6nm crystal structure

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons93463

Holmes,  Kenneth C.
Protein Cristallography XDS, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Max Planck Society;
Emeritus Group Biophysics, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Max Planck Society;
Muscle Research, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons93039

Gebhard,  Werner
Emeritus Group Biophysics, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Max Planck Society;
IT Group / Data processing, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons93650

Kabsch,  Wolfgang
Emeritus Group Biophysics, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Max Planck Society;
Department of Biomolecular Mechanisms, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
フルテキスト (公開)
公開されているフルテキストはありません
付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

Holmes, K. C., Popp, D., Gebhard, W., & Kabsch, W. (1989). The structure of F−actin calculated from X−ray fibre diagrams and the 0.6nm crystal structure. In U., Uaebi, & J., Engel (Eds.), Cytoskeletal and Extracellular Proteins (pp. 48-50). Heidelberg / Berlin: Springer.


引用: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0019-AE0C-8
要旨
The structure of the g-actin monomer complexed with DNaseI has been solved by x-ray crystallography to 0.45nm resolution, Fig.l (Kabsch, Mannherz, & Suck, 1985). In the following we describe the structure of f-actin arrived at by a search procedure: the structure obtained from crystallography at 0.6nm is placed in all possible orientations in the F-actin helix; the fibre diffraction pattern is computed from the resulting structure and compared with the x-ray diffraction data from orientated gels of F-actin (Popp, Lednev, & Jahn, 1986) measured to 0.8 nm resolution. This process yielded five possible solutions at low resolution (2.0nm) only one of which successfully refined to high resolution (0.8nm). A full account of this study is in preparation (Holmes, et al. 1989). The best of the five possible solutions resulting from the low resolution search is shown in Fig. 2. The (intensity) R-factor is 0.12. To refine at high resolution we adopted an iterative least squares procedure. However, no solution would refine satisfactorily. The resulting R-factors ranged from 0.37–0.45.