Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse




Journal Article

Sign Language Typology: The contribution of rural sign languages


De Vos,  Connie
INTERACT, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

(Publisher version), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available

De Vos, C., & Pfau, R. (2015). Sign Language Typology: The contribution of rural sign languages. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1, 265-288. doi:10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-124958.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0019-DA09-5
Since the 1990s, the field of sign language typology has shown that sign languages exhibit typological variation at all relevant levels of linguistic description. These initial typological comparisons were heavily skewed toward the urban sign languages of developed countries, mostly in the Western world. This review reports on the recent contributions made by rural signing varieties, that is, sign languages that have evolved in village communities, often in developing countries, due to a high incidence of deafness. With respect to a number of structural properties, rural sign languages fit into previously established typological classifications. However, they also exhibit unique and typologically marked features that challenge received views on possible sign languages. At the same time, the shared features of geographically dispersed rural signing varieties provide a unique window into the social dynamics that may shape the structures of modern human languages.