Collective Management of Copyrights and the EU Principle of Free Movement of 
Services after the OSA Judgment - In Favour of a More Balance Approach

Drexl, Josef

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04903-8_22

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Zur Ablage hinzufügen

Lokale TagsFreigabegeschichteDetailsÜbersicht

Freigegeben

Beitrag in Festschrift

Collective Management of Copyrights and the EU Principle of Free Movement of Services after the OSA Judgment - In Favour of a More Balance Approach

MPG-Autoren

/persons/resource/persons51178

Drexl, Josef
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2397062
(Preprint)

Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)

Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.

Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)

Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar

Zitation

Drexl, J. (2014). Collective Management of Copyrights and the EU Principle of Free Movement of Services after the OSA Judgment - In Favour of a More Balance Approach. In K. Purnhagen (Ed.), Varieties of European Economic Law and Regulation: Liber Amicorum for Hans Micklitz (pp. 459-487). Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.

Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-001A-0357-A

Zusammenfassung

On 20 February 2014, the Council of the European Union has adopted the new Directive on Collective Rights Management. In its Proposal for this Directive, the Commission argued that cross-border collective rights management services are liberalised pursuant to Article 16 of the Services Directive of 2006. Yet, only one week after the adoption of the new Directive, this view was rejected by the Court of Justice of the EU in the OSA judgment. This paper analyses the relationship between the principle of free movement of services and national sector-specific regulation of CMOs in more detail in order to explore to which extent the principle of free movement of services and the need for specific rules for collective management of copyrights could be better coordinated in the future.