Response to commentaries on our paper: Critical comments on dynamic causal 
modelling

Lohmann, G; Erfurth, K; Müller, K; Turner, R

doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.041

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Response to commentaries on our paper: Critical comments on dynamic causal modelling

MPS-Authors

There are no MPG-Authors in the publication available

External Resource

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811912007707
(Publisher version)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Lohmann, G., Erfurth, K., Müller, K., & Turner, R. (2013). Response to commentaries on our paper: Critical comments on dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage, 75, 279-281. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.041.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-001A-14E3-B

Abstract

First of all, we would like to state that we are pleased that our paper has spawned a vivid debate about the validity of DCM. Given that DCM has been around for so many years, we think that this was long overdue. In the following, we would like to respond to the comments by Friston et al. and Breakspear.