English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Talk

Echo-subject in Southern Vanuatu versus switch-reference

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons1217

Hammond,  Jeremy
Syntax, Typology, and Information Structure, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
International Max Planck Research School for Language Sciences, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)

de Sousa Hammond 2010 handout.pdf
(Supplementary material), 258KB

Citation

Hammond, J., & De Sousa, H. (2010). Echo-subject in Southern Vanuatu versus switch-reference. Talk presented at 8th International Conference on Oceanic Linguistics (COOL8). Auckland University. 2010-01-04 - 2010-01-09.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-63F7-B
Abstract
In this talk we discuss the echo subject (ES) system in Whitesands, and contrast the ES system in Whitesands — and Vanuatu ES systems in general — with the better known New Guinean type of switch reference (SR) systems. Like other Southern Vanuatu languages, Whitesands has an ES marker. The ES marker m- is used instead of a normal subject prefix when the subject of a clause is coreferential with some reference(s) of the preceding clause. The antecedent is usually the subject, but it can also be the object, an oblique, or some combinations of these. Together with a brief survey of ES systems in other Vanuatu languages, we will conclude that the ES systems in Vanuatu are used solely for the syntacto-semantic function of reference tracking. This contrasts with the New Guinean type of SR systems, which is used for both reference tracking and the discourse function of indicating participant continuity versus discontinuity. For instance, the so-called ‘same subject’ or ‘coreferential’ marker, other than indicating that some reference is coreferential with another reference, also indicates that the ‘SR pivot’ is a salient participant, and that it will remain foregrounded, or reappear in the foreground sometime later in the discourse.