English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Speeding up Directed Evolution: Combining the Advantages of Solid-Phase Combinatorial Gene Synthesis with Statistically Guided Reduction of Screening Effort

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons137052

Höbenreich,  Sabrina
Research Department Reetz, Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung, Max Planck Society;
Philipps-Universität Marburg, Fachbereich Chemie;

/persons/resource/persons59146

Zilly,  Felipe
Research Department Reetz, Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung, Max Planck Society;
Philipps-Universität Marburg, Fachbereich Chemie;

/persons/resource/persons132851

Acevedo-Rocha,  Carlos G.
Research Department Reetz, Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung, Max Planck Society;
Philipps-Universität Marburg, Fachbereich Chemie;

/persons/resource/persons58919

Reetz,  Manfred T.
Research Department Reetz, Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung, Max Planck Society;
Philipps-Universität Marburg, Fachbereich Chemie;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Höbenreich, S., Zilly, F., Acevedo-Rocha, C. G., Zilly, M., & Reetz, M. T. (2015). Speeding up Directed Evolution: Combining the Advantages of Solid-Phase Combinatorial Gene Synthesis with Statistically Guided Reduction of Screening Effort. ACS Synthetic Biology, 317-331. doi:10.1021/sb5002399.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0024-5711-A
Abstract
Efficient and economic methods in directed evolution at the protein, metabolic, and genome level are needed for biocatalyst development and the success of synthetic biology. In contrast to random strategies, semirational approaches such as saturation mutagenesis explore the sequence space in a focused manner. Although several combinatorial libraries based on saturation mutagenesis have been reported using solid-phase gene synthesis, direct comparison with traditional PCR-based methods is currently lacking. In this work, we compare combinatorial protein libraries created in-house via PCR versus those generated by commercial solid-phase gene synthesis. Using descriptive statistics and probabilistic distributions on amino acid occurrence frequencies, the quality of the libraries was assessed and compared, revealing that the outsourced libraries are characterized by less bias and outliers than the PCR-based ones. Afterward, we screened all libraries following a traditional algorithm for almost complete library coverage and compared this approach with an emergent statistical concept suggesting screening a lower portion of the protein sequence space. Upon analyzing the biocatalytic landscapes and best hits of all combinatorial libraries, we show that the screening effort could have been reduced in all cases by more than 50%, while still finding at least one of the best mutants.