日本語
English
Deutsch
日本語
Help
Privacy Policy
ポリシー/免責事項
全文を含む
詳細検索
ブラウズ
ホーム
一時保存 (0)
ツール
アイテム詳細
登録内容を編集
ファイル形式で保存
一時保存へ追加
#
タグ情報を表示
リリース履歴を表示
詳細
要約
公開
論文集への寄稿
Mandatory Licensing Under Patent Law and Competition Law: Different Concerns, Complementary Roles
MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons51254
Ullrich, Hanns
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;
External Resource
There are no locators available
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
フルテキスト (公開)
公開されているフルテキストはありません
付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用
引用:
https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0024-A013-0
要旨
The purpose of this chapter is limited to defining the differences of the functions and of the operation of compulsory licences, which typically are available under patent law, on one hand, or, on the other, are imposed as a matter of enforcing the antitrust laws. The thesis of this contribution is that each of patent law’s compulsory licensing rules does (and ought to) follow its own distinct rationale. Their common denominator is that they are specific to the systematic operation of patent protection as an incentive mechanism for innovation. By contrast, competition law constitutes part of the framework regulation of the market. Where its application results in imposing licensing obligations on patentees, it does so in order to correct an unjustified restriction of competition. This remedial function of antitrust-related licensing obligations is complementary to but different from patent law’s rules on compulsory licensing. The different functions of system-supportive or system-intrinsic mandatory licensing rules and competition-related obligations also mean that before introducing new or broadening existing provisions on compulsory licences a proper diagnosis has to be made of the ill that they are supposed to cure.