User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse




Conference Paper

Human Pose Estimation with Fields of Parts


Kiefel,  Martin
Dept. Empirical Inference, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Max Planck Society;


Gehler,  Peter
Dept. Perceiving Systems, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Max Planck Society;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available

Kiefel, M., & Gehler, P. (2014). Human Pose Estimation with Fields of Parts. In D. Fleet, T. Pajdla, B. Schiele, & T. Tuytelaars (Eds.), Computer Vision - ECCV 2014. Proceedings, Part 5 (pp. 331-346). Cham et al.: Springer International Publishing.

Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0024-C6FF-3
This paper proposes a new formulation of the human pose estimation problem. We present the Fields of Parts model, a binary Conditional Random Field model designed to detect human body parts of articulated people in single images. The Fields of Parts model is inspired by the idea of Pictorial Structures, it models local appearance and joint spatial configuration of the human body. However the underlying graph structure is entirely different. The idea is simple: we model the presence and absence of a body part at every possible position, orientation, and scale in an image with a binary random variable. This results into a vast number of random variables, however, we show that approximate inference in this model is efficient. Moreover we can encode the very same appearance and spatial structure as in Pictorial Structures models. This approach allows us to combine ideas from segmentation and pose estimation into a single model. The Fields of Parts model can use evidence from the background, include local color information, and it is connected more densely than a kinematic chain structure. On the challenging Leeds Sports Poses dataset we improve over the Pictorial Structures counterpart by 5.5 percent in terms of Average Precision of Keypoints (APK).