English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

The time course of phase correction: A kinematic investigation of motor adjustment to timing perturbations during sensorimotor synchronization

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons19767

Keller,  Peter E.
Max Planck Research Group Music Cognition and Action, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Hove, M. J., Balasubramaniam, R., & Keller, P. E. (2014). The time course of phase correction: A kinematic investigation of motor adjustment to timing perturbations during sensorimotor synchronization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(6), 2243-2251. doi:10.1037/a0037826.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0025-1A97-3
Abstract
Synchronizing movements with a beat requires rapid compensation for timing errors. The phase-correction response (PCR) has been studied extensively in finger tapping by shifting a metronome onset and measuring the adjustment of the following tap time. How the response unfolds during the subsequent tap cycle remains unknown. Using motion capture, we examined finger kinematics during the PCR. Participants tapped with a metronome containing phase perturbations. They tapped in “legato” and “staccato” style at various tempi, which altered the timing of the constituent movement stages (dwell at the surface, extension, and flexion). After a phase perturbation, tapping kinematics changed compared with baseline, and the PCR was distributed differently across movement stages. In staccato tapping, the PCR trajectory changed primarily during finger extension across tempi. In legato tapping, at fast tempi the PCR occurred primarily during extension, whereas at slow tempi most phase correction was already completed during dwell. Across conditions, timing adjustments occurred primarily 100–250 ms into the following tap cycle. The change in movement around 100 ms represents the time to integrate information into an already planned movement and the rapidity suggests a subcortical route.