Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Key ITER plasma edge and plasma–material interaction issues

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons109153

Geier,  A.
Experimental Plasma Physics 1 (E1), Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons109371

Herrmann,  A.
Experimental Plasma Physics 1 (E1), Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons109704

Krieger,  K.
Material Research (MF), Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons109733

Kukushkin,  A.
Material Research (MF), Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons110046

Neu,  R.
Experimental Plasma Physics 4 (E4), Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons110606

Sugihara,  M.
Experimental Plasma Physics 2 (E2), Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Federici, G., Andrew, P., Barabashi, P., Brooks, J., Doerner, R., Geier, A., et al. (2003). Key ITER plasma edge and plasma–material interaction issues. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 313-316, 11-22. doi:10.1016/S0022-3115(02)01327-2.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0027-3C33-E
Zusammenfassung
Some of the remaining crucial plasma edge physics and plasma–material interaction issues of the ITER tokamak are discussed in this paper, using either modelling or projections of experimental results from existing tokamak operation or relevant laboratory simulations. The paper covers the following subject areas at issue in the design of the ITER device: (1) plasma thermal loads during Type I ELMs and disruptions, ensuing erosion effects and prospects for mitigating measures, (2) control of co-deposited tritium inventory when carbon is used even on small areas in the divertor near the strike points, (3) efficiency of edge and core fuelling for expected pedestal densities in ITER, and (4) erosion and impurity transport with a full tungsten divertor. Directions and priorities of future research are proposed to narrow remaining uncertainties in the above areas.