English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

When less is more: Non-monotonic spike sequence processing in neurons

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons14934

Chang,  S.
Research Group of Activity-Dependent and Developmental Plasticity at the Calyx of Held, MPI for Biophysical Chemistry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons185565

Taschenberger,  Holger       
Research Group of Activity-Dependent and Developmental Plasticity at the Calyx of Held, MPI for Biophysical Chemistry, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

2149569.pdf
(Publisher version), 812KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Arnoldt, H., Chang, S., Jahnke, S., Urmersbach, B., Taschenberger, H., & Timme, M. (2015). When less is more: Non-monotonic spike sequence processing in neurons. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(2): e1004002. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004002.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0026-C662-F
Abstract
Fundamental response properties of neurons centrally underly the computational capabilities of both individual nerve cells and neural networks. Most studies on neuronal input-output relations have focused on continuous-time inputs such as constant or noisy sinusoidal currents. Yet, most neurons communicate via exchanging action potentials (spikes) at discrete times. Here, we systematically analyze the stationary spiking response to regular spiking inputs and reveal that it is generically non-monotonic. Our theoretical analysis shows that the underlying mechanism relies solely on a combination of the discrete nature of the communication by spikes, the capability of locking output to input spikes and limited resources required for spike processing. Numerical simulations of mathematically idealized and biophysically detailed models, as well as neurophysiological experiments confirm and illustrate our theoretical predictions.