English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
  Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released
Journal Article

Intransitive competition is widespread in plant communities and maintains their species richness

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons62544

Schöning,  Ingo       
Soil and Ecosystem Processes, Dr. M. Schrumpf, Department Biogeochemical Processes, Prof. S. E. Trumbore, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons62549

Schulze,  Ernst Detlef
Emeritus Group, Prof. E.-D. Schulze, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Soliveres, S., Maestre, F. T., Ulrich, W., Manning, P., Boch, S., Bowker, M. A., et al. (2015). Intransitive competition is widespread in plant communities and maintains their species richness. Ecology Letters, 18(8), 790-798. doi:10.1111/ele.12456.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0027-7F43-C
Abstract
Intransitive competition networks, those in which there is no single best competitor, may ensure
species coexistence. However, their frequency and importance in maintaining diversity in realworld
ecosystems remain unclear. We used two large data sets from drylands and agricultural
grasslands to assess: (1) the generality of intransitive competition, (2) intransitivity–richness relationships
and (3) effects of two major drivers of biodiversity loss (aridity and land-use intensification)
on intransitivity and species richness. Intransitive competition occurred in > 65% of sites
and was associated with higher species richness. Intransitivity increased with aridity, partly buffering
its negative effects on diversity, but was decreased by intensive land use, enhancing its negative
effects on diversity. These contrasting responses likely arise because intransitivity is promoted by
temporal heterogeneity, which is enhanced by aridity but may decline with land-use intensity. We
show that intransitivity is widespread in nature and increases diversity, but it can be lost with environmental homogenisation.