English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
  Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released
Journal Article

Dynamic network participation of functional connectivity hubs assessed by resting-state fMRI

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons133483

Lohmann,  G
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Department High-Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00195/pdf
(Publisher version)

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Schaefer, A., Margulies, D., Lohmann, G., Gorgolewski, K., Smallwood, J., Kiebel, S., et al. (2014). Dynamic network participation of functional connectivity hubs assessed by resting-state fMRI. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8: 195, pp. 1-13. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00195.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0027-801D-0
Abstract
Network studies of large-scale brain connectivity have demonstrated that highly connected areas, or ldquo;hubs,rdquo; are a key feature of human functional and structural brain organization. We use resting-state functional MRI data and connectivity clustering to identify multi-network hubs and show that while hubs can belong to multiple networks their degree of integration into these different networks varies dynamically over time. The extent of the network variation was related to the connectedness of the hub. In addition, we found that these network dynamics were inversely related to positive self-generated thoughts reported by individuals and were further decreased with older age. Moreover, the left caudate varied its degree of participation between a default mode subnetwork and a limbic network. This variation was predictive of individual differences in the reports of past-related thoughts. These results support an association between ongoing thought processes and network dynamics and offer a new approach to investigate the brain dynamics underlying mental experience.