English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Controls on the emission of plant volatiles through stomata: Differential sensitivity of emission rates to stomatal closure explained

MPS-Authors
There are no MPG-Authors in the publication available
External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

BEX320.pdf
(Publisher version), 320KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Niinemets, U., & Reichstein, M. (2003). Controls on the emission of plant volatiles through stomata: Differential sensitivity of emission rates to stomatal closure explained. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 108(D7): 4208. doi:10.1029/2002JD002620.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0027-9CA9-6
Abstract
[1] Volatile (VOC) flux from leaves may be expressed as G(S)DeltaP, where G(S) is stomatal conductance to specific compound and DeltaP partial pressure gradient between the atmosphere and substomatal cavities. It has been suggested that decreases in G(S) are balanced by increases in DeltaP such that stomata cannot control VOC emission. Yet, responses of emission rates of various volatiles to experimental manipulations of stomatal aperture are contrasting. To explain these controversies, a dynamic emission model was developed considering VOC distribution between gas and liquid phases using Henry's law constant (H, Pa m(3) mol(-1)). Our analysis demonstrates that highly volatile compounds such as isoprene and monoterpenes with H values on the order of 10(3) have gas and liquid pool half-times of a few seconds, and thus cannot be controlled by stomata. More soluble compounds such as alcohols and carboxylic acids with H values of 10(-2)-10(1) are controlled by stomata with the degree of stomatal sensitivity varying with H. Inability of compounds with high solubility to support a high partial pressure, and thus to balance DeltaP in response to a decrease in G(S) is the primary explanation for different stomatal sensitivities. For compounds with low H, the analysis predicts bursts of emission after stomatal opening that accord with experimental observations, but that cannot be currently explained. Large within-leaf VOC pool sizes in compounds with low H also increase the system inertia to environmental fluctuations. In conclusion, dynamic models are necessary to simulate diurnal variability of the emissions of compounds that preferably partition to aqueous phase.