English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Analysis and comparison of two finite element algorithms for dislocation density based crystal plasticity

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons125413

Svendsen,  Bob
Material Mechanics, Faculty of Georesources and Materials Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Schinkelstraße 2, D-52062 Aachen, Germany;
Microstructure Physics and Alloy Design, Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH, Max Planck Society;

Locator
There are no locators available
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts available
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Klusemann, B., Svendsen, B., & Bargmann, S. (2013). Analysis and comparison of two finite element algorithms for dislocation density based crystal plasticity. GAMM-Mitteilungen, 36(2), 219-238. doi:10.1002/gamm.201310013.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0027-A199-0
Abstract
The purpose of the current work is the formulation and comparison of two finite element algorithms for a dislocation density based crystal plasticity model. We study multiscale inelastic materials whose behavior is influenced by the evolution of inelastic microstructure and the corresponding material or internal lengthscales. The work is an extension of the first investigation in Klusemann et al. [1] which was limited to a one-dimensional bar. In the γ -algorithm, the displacement u and glide system slips γα are global unknowns and determined via weak field relations. The non-dimensional densities of geometrically necessary dislocations ρ̄α are local quantities and solved for via a strong field relation. In the Q -algorithm, both the displacement uand dislocation densities ρ̄α are modeled as global, and the glide system slips γα as local. As it turns out, both algorithms generally predict the same microstructural behavior on a single crystal level. However, for a polycrystal the two solution strategies predict different material behaviors due to the formulation-dependent representation of the boundary conditions. The introduction of a boundary layer in the model leads to good agreement between both algorithms for single and polycrystal simulations. Copyright © 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.