English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Is the consensus value of Anu sucrose (IAEA C-6) too high?

MPS-Authors
There are no MPG-Authors in the publication available
External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Xu, X. M., Khosh, M. S., Druffel-Rodriguez, K. C., Trumbore, S. E., & Southon, J. R. (2010). Is the consensus value of Anu sucrose (IAEA C-6) too high? Radiocarbon, 52(3), 866-874. doi:10.1186/1742-9994-3-22.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0027-C2BD-C
Abstract
Primary and secondary standards are essential in radiocarbon analyses for the purpose of reporting and comparing data among laboratories, as well as for internal laboratory data quality control. ANU sucrose is one of the IAEA-certified C-14 standards (C-6) with a consensus value of 1.5061 +/- 0.0011 fraction modern (Fm). All of our measurements of ANU sucrose (n = 351) as a secondary standard over the last 7 yr result in an average value of 1.5016 +/- 0.0005 Fm (2-sigma standard error). After applying the same outlier tests used for IAEA reference standards, a weighted average value of 1.5016 +/- 0.0002 Fm (n = 294) was calculated. This value is significantly lower than the IAEA C-6 consensus value (I test with unequal variance; p = 0.023). In contrast, our measurements of other secondary standards over the same time period are in excellent agreement with their respective consensus values. Since ANU is the only secondary standard measured in our lab that does not agree with the consensus values, and we have measured a larger number analyses compared to what went into the definition of the consensus value, we suggest that the consensus value of ANU sucrose might be too high by 0.0045 +/- 0.0011 Fm. Given that some labs routinely use ANU sucrose as a primary standard, our results suggest that revisiting the consensus value of ANU sucrose may be necessary.