English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Dictyostelium discoideum chemotaxis: Threshold for directed motion

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons21364

Beta,  Carsten
Laboratory for Fluid Dynamics, Pattern Formation and Biocomplexity, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons173453

Bae,  Albert
Laboratory for Fluid Dynamics, Pattern Formation and Biocomplexity, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons173472

Bodenschatz,  Eberhard       
Laboratory for Fluid Dynamics, Pattern Formation and Biocomplexity, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Song, L., Nadkarni, S. M., Bödeker, H. U., Beta, C., Bae, A., Franck, C., et al. (2006). Dictyostelium discoideum chemotaxis: Threshold for directed motion. European Journal of Cell Biology, 85(9-10), 981-989. doi:10.1016/j.ejcb.2006.01.012.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0029-14B1-1
Abstract
The chemotactic response of Dictyostelium discoideum cells to stationary, linear gradients of cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate (cAMP) was studied using microfluidic devices. In shallow gradients of less than 10−3 nM/μm, the cells showed no directional response and exhibited a constant basal motility. In steeper gradients, cells moved up the gradient on average. The chemotactic speed and the motility increased with increasing steepness up to a plateau at around 10−1 nM/μm. In very steep gradients, above 10 nM/μm, the cells lost directionality and the motility returned to the sub-threshold level. In the regime of optimal response the difference in receptor occupancy at the front and back of the cell is estimated to be only about 100 molecules.