English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Poster

The significance of silence. Long gaps attenuate the preference for ‘yes’ responses in conversation.

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons49585

Bögels,  Sara
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
INTERACT, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons4391

Kendrick,  Kobin H.
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
INTERACT, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons116

Levinson,  Stephen C.
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
INTERACT, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Bögels, S., Kendrick, K. H., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). The significance of silence. Long gaps attenuate the preference for ‘yes’ responses in conversation. Poster presented at the 19th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (SemDial 2015 / goDIAL), Gothenburg, Sweden.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0028-4B44-9
Abstract
In conversation, negative responses to invitations,
requests, offers and the like more often occur with
a delay – conversation analysts talk of them as
dispreferred. Here we examine the contrastive
cognitive load ‘yes’ and ‘no’ responses make,
either when given relatively fast (300 ms) or
delayed (1000 ms). Participants heard minidialogues,
with turns extracted from a spoken
corpus, while having their EEG recorded. We find
that a fast ‘no’ evokes an N400-effect relative to a
fast ‘yes’, however this contrast is not present for
delayed responses. This shows that an immediate
response is expected to be positive – but this
expectation disappears as the response time
lengthens because now in ordinary conversation
the probability of a ‘no’ has increased.
Additionally, however, 'No' responses elicit a late
frontal positivity both when they are fast and when
they are delayed. Thus, regardless of the latency of
response, a ‘no’ response is associated with a late
positivity, since a negative response is always
dispreferred and may require an account. Together
these results show that negative responses to social
actions exact a higher cognitive load, but especially
when least expected, as an immediate response.