English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Non-Markovian quantum state diffusion for absorption spectra of molecular aggregates

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons184892

Roden,  J.
Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons145750

Eisfeld,  A.
Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Roden, J., Strunz, W. T., & Eisfeld, A. (2011). Non-Markovian quantum state diffusion for absorption spectra of molecular aggregates. Journal of Chemical Physics, 134(3): 034902.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0029-8DCB-5
Abstract
In many molecular systems one encounters the situation where electronic excitations couple to a quasi-continuum of phonon modes. The interaction to that often structured continuum may be highly frequency dependent, e. g. due to some weakly damped high frequency modes. To handle such a situation, an approach combining the non-Markovian quantum state diffusion description of open quantum systems with an efficient but abstract approximation was recently applied to calculate energy transfer and absorption spectra of molecular aggregates [J. Roden, A. Eisfeld, W. Wolff, W. T. Strunz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 058301 (2009)]. To explore the validity of the used approximation for such complicated systems, in the present work we compare the calculated (approximative) absorption spectra with exact results. These are obtained from the method of pseudomodes, which we show to be capable of determining the exact spectra for small aggregates and a few pseudomodes. It turns out that in the cases considered, the results of the two approaches mostly agree quite well. The advantages and disadvantages of the two approaches are discussed. (C) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3512979]