English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Competition Law at the Crossroads in the Digital Economy: is it all about Google?

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons51397

Surblyte,  Gintare
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Surblyte, G. (2015). Competition Law at the Crossroads in the Digital Economy: is it all about Google? Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 4(5), 170-179.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0029-370F-A
Abstract
On 15 April 2015 the European Commission sent a Statement of Objections to Google in the framework of its ongoing investigation, which was opened against the company on 30 November 2010. The allegations against Google are the preferential treatment of its results in online search, i. e. that the company prefers “Google Shopping” to the vertical search results of its rivals. The competition law concerns of the European Commission are thereby an alleged abuse of a dominant position by Google (Article 102 TFEU). The investigation against Google is, on the one hand, an example of complex questions, which are posed to competition law in the Digital Economy. On the other hand, it is a “peak of an iceberg” in a much broader context. The Internet has embraced new business models, which (possibly) impact the patterns of users’ behaviour in the information-based economy. For competition law this means that, in order to better understand online markets, a much broader analysis may be needed, in particular, in terms of an interdisciplinary research on sociological and psychological aspects of the behaviour of Internet users. The question thereby is whether a “more behavioural approach” to competition law needs to be integrated into a competition law assessment. The case against Google is thereby an impulse, and may, thus, be the beginning rather than the end of the story.