Biased processing of ambiguous symptoms favors the initially leading hypothesis 
in sequential diagnostic reasoning

Rebitschek, Felix G.; Bocklisch, Franziska; Scholz, Agnes; Krems, Josef F.; Jahn, Georg

doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000298

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Biased processing of ambiguous symptoms favors the initially leading hypothesis in sequential diagnostic reasoning

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons187898

Rebitschek, Felix G.
Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Max Planck Society;
Harding Center for Risk Literacy, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000298
(Any fulltext)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Rebitschek, F. G., Bocklisch, F., Scholz, A., Krems, J. F., & Jahn, G. (2015). Biased processing of ambiguous symptoms favors the initially leading hypothesis in sequential diagnostic reasoning. Experimental Psychology, 62(5), 287-305. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000298.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0029-68F2-C

Abstract

There is no abstract available