English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

The use of intonation for turn anticipation in observed conversations without visual signals as source of information

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons19852

Keitel,  Anne
Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom;
Research Group Infant Cognition and Action, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons19594

Daum,  Moritz M.
Department Psychology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;
Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Switzerland;

Locator
There are no locators available
Fulltext (public)

Keitel_2015.pdf
(Publisher version), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Keitel, A., & Daum, M. M. (2015). The use of intonation for turn anticipation in observed conversations without visual signals as source of information. Frontiers in Psychology, 6: 108. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00108.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0029-AA86-8
Abstract
The anticipation of a speaker’s next turn is a key element of successful conversation. This can be achieved using a multitude of cues. In natural conversation, the most important cue for adults to anticipate the end of a turn (and therefore the beginning of the next turn) is the semantic and syntactic content. In addition, prosodic cues, such as intonation, or visual signals that occur before a speaker starts speaking (e.g., opening the mouth) help to identify the beginning and the end of a speaker’s turn. Early in life, prosodic cues seem to be more important than in adulthood. For example, it was previously shown that 3-year-old children anticipated more turns in observed conversations when intonation was available compared with when not, and this beneficial effect was present neither in younger children nor in adults (Keitel et al., 2013). In the present study, we investigated this effect in greater detail. Videos of conversations between puppets with either normal or flattened intonation were presented to children (1-year-olds and 3-year-olds) and adults. The use of puppets allowed the control of visual signals: the verbal signals (speech) started exactly at the same time as the visual signals (mouth opening). With respect to the children, our findings replicate the results of the previous study: 3-year-olds anticipated more turns with normal intonation than with flattened intonation, whereas 1-year-olds did not show this effect. In contrast to our previous findings, the adults showed the same intonation effect as the 3-year-olds. This suggests that adults’ cue use varies depending on the characteristics of a conversation. Our results further support the notion that the cues used to anticipate conversational turns differ in development.