Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse





Inequality, Status, and Subjective Well-Being

There are no MPG-Authors in the publication available
External Resource

(Supplementary material)

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)

(Supplementary material), 223MB


Alderson, A. (2016). Inequality, Status, and Subjective Well-Being. Talk presented at Öffentlicher Vortrag am MPIfG. Köln. 2016-01-27.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002A-04F8-2
Subjective well–being is shaped by social inequality. For instance, in every society for which we have data, rich people tend to be happier than poor people. Using unique data gathered by the author on social comparison, we can now better distinguish between relative and absolute income effects on subjective well-being. We can also assess the association between well-being and standing on other goods with varying positional or Veblen-good characteristics (i.e., home, cars, clothes, education, vacation time, and cultural activities). The central analysis indicates that the effect of income on subjective well-being in the US is largely relative, lending support to the idea that happiness is shaped by the operation of a positional treadmill, in addition to an hedonic treadmill. Art Alderson is Professor of Sociology at Indiana University. He is currently doing research on income distribution, the world city system, globalization, and status and subjective well-being, lifestyle, and consumption.